Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dosen Favorit Mahasiswa


Authors

  • Desyanti Desyanti Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Dumai, Indonesia
  • Mesran Mesran Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma, Indonesia
  • Erlin Windia Ambarsari Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47065/jimat.v4i3.406

Keywords:

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan; Simple Additive Weighting; Kinerja Dosen; Penilaian Mahasiswa; Transparansi

Abstract

College X in Dumai City always strives to continuously improve internal quality so that it can compete with other universities. One effort to improve quality is by assessing lecturer performance every year. So far, the process of selecting outstanding lecturers or favorite lecturers is still based on the subjectivity of those who choose, so there is a lack of transparency in the selection process. This research discusses the application of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method in a decision support system for selecting favorite lecturers at College X, Dumai. Lecturer performance assessment is based on criteria such as discipline, achievement, behavior, responsibility and communication, involving students as respondents. Data was collected through literature studies, interviews, observations and Likert scale-based questionnaires. The calculation process using the SAW method includes normalization of the decision matrix and ranking based on criteria weights. The research results show that the SAW method provides objective, transparent and systematic results in selecting favorite lecturers. The system developed is able to support universities in improving the quality of lecturers through more structured feedback.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. K. Sholekhah, “Hubungan Manajemen Performa Kinerja Dosen Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa FKG Unimus,” Medica Arter., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 53, 2020, doi: 10.26714/medart.2.1.2020.53-62.

R. R. Jajuk Herawati, “Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Dosen,” J. Akunt. Manaj. Akmenika, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 454–472, 2019.

I. N. Arifin, “Pengaruh Kinerja Dosen terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa pada Pembelajaran Sains Permulaan di Kelas Rendah,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 490, 2020, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.613.

N. Saputri, Nadiya, and Amelia, “Pengaruh Kinerja Dosen, Kualitas Pelayanan Akademik, dan Fasilitas Belajar Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh,” JEMSI (Jurnal Ekon. Manajemen, dan Akuntansi), vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 2268–2277, 2023, doi: 10.35870/jemsi.v9i5.1582.

I. A. Permana, “Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Balance Scorecard (Studi Kasus Stt Sangkakala),” J. Ris. Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 89, 2020, doi: 10.26623/jreb.v13i2.2437.

R. Ginanjar, E. Winarti, and I. G. A. K. Yoga, “Analisis Kinerja Dosen pada Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi di Kota Semarang,” J. Ilm. Aset, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 147–162, 2022, doi: 10.37470/1.24.2.208.

N. Nyoto, “Eksplorasi Kinerja Dosen Melalui Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi,” Procur. J. Ilm. Manaj., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 428–438, 2021, doi: 10.35145/procuratio.v9i4.1792.

L. A. Airlangga, S. Syaibah, and E. Erwin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Dosen Favorit Pilihan Mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak Metode Profile Matching,” Cybernetics, vol. 3, no. 01. p. 8, 2019. doi: 10.29406/cbn.v3i01.1460.

Megawaty and M. Ulfa, “Metode Sistem Penunjang Keputusan,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 192–201, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://journal-isi.org/index.php/isi

N. Marpaung, M. Handayani, and R. Yesputra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dosen Terbaik Dengan Metode Weighted Product (WP) Pada STMIK Royal,” Semin. Nas. R. 2018, vol. 9986, no. September, pp. 267–270, 2018.

F. P. Hutagaol, Mesran, and J. H. Lubis, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dalam Pemilihan Handphone Bekas,” Bull. Inf. Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 63–68, 2021.

F. A. Mustika and Y. Wibawanti, “Penerapan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) Untuk Penentuan Lokasi Cabang Toko Emas F,” JRKT (Jurnal Rekayasa Komputasi Ter., vol. 2, no. 04, pp. 217–223, 2022, doi: 10.30998/jrkt.v2i04.8097.

R. Rachman, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Untuk Penilaian Karyawan Pada Kenaikan Jabatan,” J. Tekno Insentif, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 21–27, 2019, doi: 10.36787/jti.v12i2.71.

A. Febtriko and I. Puspitasari, “Mengukur Kreatifitas Dan Kualitas Pemograman Pada Siswa Smk Kota Pekanbaru Jurusan Teknik Komputer Jaringan Dengan Simulasi Robot,” Rabit J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf. Univrab, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.36341/rabit.v3i1.419.

B. Simamora, “Skala Likert, Bias Penggunaan dan Jalan Keluarnya,” J. Manaj., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 84–93, 2022, doi: 10.46806/jman.v12i1.978.

W. I. Rahayu and M. R. Shafina, “Aplikasi Analisis Kelayakan Sistem Untuk Pengukuran Usability Dengan Menerapkan Metode Use Questionnaire,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 2022, 2022.

M. Fransiska, R. Fernando, and D. Pibriana, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dalam Pengembangan Sistem Penentuan Kenaikan Gaji Karyawan Application of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method in the Development of a Determination System Increase in Employee Salary,” Jtsi, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–22, 2020.

C. E. Wijaya and A. Farisi, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Karyawan Terbaik,” J. Manaj. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 260–267, 2024, doi: 10.33998/jms.2024.4.1.1621.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dosen Favorit Mahasiswa

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY

Published: 2024-07-31

Abstract View: 125 times
PDF Download: 88 times

Issue

Section

Articles