Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan Profile Matching Terhadap Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Paskibraka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v5i5.765Keywords:
Decision Support System; MAUT; Profile Matching; Paskibraka Selection; Method ComparisonAbstract
The selection of candidates for the Flag Raising Troop (Paskibraka) requires an objective, transparent, and consistent assessment system based on physical criteria, general intelligence, personality, marching skills, and physical fitness. This study compares the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) and Profile Matching (PM) methods in supporting selection decision making. The MAUT method produces a utility score by considering the weight of each criterion, while PM assesses the level of conformity to the ideal profile through GAP analysis grouped into Core Factor (CF) and Secondary Factor (SF). The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the MAUT and Profile Matching methods in the decision support system for Paskibraka candidate selection. The calculation results show that candidate A3 obtained the highest score in both methods (MAUT = 0.970; PM = 3.600), followed by A1 (MAUT = 0.957; PM = 3.500) and A9 (MAUT = 0.918; PM = 3.450). This consistency indicates a convergence in the assessment of high-performing candidates. However, differences emerge in the middle ranks, for example, A2, which ranked 8th on the MAUT (0.856) but rose to 4th on the PM (3.100). Differences in assessment principles are the main factor: MAUT emphasizes an even distribution of scores across all criteria, while PM focuses more on fit with the ideal profile, particularly on the core criteria (CF). This finding emphasizes that the choice of methods should be tailored to selection priorities, or used in combination to obtain more accurate and objective results.
Downloads
References
Khairuddin, “Diagnosis Psikologi dalam Proses Rekrutmen Calon Paskibraka Provinsi Sumatera Utara Tahun 2021 Psychological Diagnosis in the Recruitment Process for Candidates for the North Sumatra Province Paskibraka in 2021,” J. Pengabdian, Pemberdaya. Dan Penyul. Kpd. Masy., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2021.
I. M. L. Suci Milasari, Imam Himawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Anggota,” pp. 302–308, 2024.
A. A. Mulyanata, Y. Yunita, and D. Rodiah, “Member Election Decision Support System South Sumatera Paskibraka Using Topsis-Promethee Method,” Sriwij. J. Informatics Appl., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 48–56, 2022, doi: 10.36706/sjia.v3i2.41.
A. L. S. Hawa, R. S. Rohman, E. Marsusanti, and D. A. Firmansah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Calon Anggota Paskibraka Menggunakan Metode Smart Pada Disparpora Tasikmalaya,” J. Responsif Ris. Sains dan Inform., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2024, doi: 10.51977/jti.v6i1.1414.
M. F. Maulidanitamyizi, H. Hoiriyah, and H. Hozairi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Anggota Paskibraka Kabupaten Pamekasan,” J-Intech, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 119–128, 2023, doi: 10.32664/j-intech.v11i1.843.
G. W. Nyipto Wibowo, S. Saludin, L. Sitorus, G. C. Setyawan, and J. Hutahaean, “Seleksi Peserta Lomba Paskibraka Menggunakan Metode Hybrid AHP-SAW,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 804–810, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josh.v4i3.3266.
D. Widiyawati, D. Dedih, and W. Wahyudi, “Implementasi Metode Maut Dan Saw Dalam Pemilihan Tempat Wisata Di Kabupaten Karawang,” J. Interkom J. Publ. Ilm. Bid. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 71–80, 2022, doi: 10.35969/interkom.v17i2.231.
I. P. D. Suarnatha, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Ketua Bem Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching,” J. Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2023, doi: 10.24076/joism.2023v4i2.952.
I. P. D. Suarnatha, I. G. A. Gunadi, and K. Y. E. Aryanto, “Combination of the Profile Matching and Topsis Method in Decision Support System of Lecturer Performance Assessment,” J. Ris. Inform., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 267–276, 2021, doi: 10.34288/jri.v3i3.237.
M. N. D. Satria, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Staff Administrasi Menggunakan Metode VIKOR,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–49, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jaiti.v1i1.24.
F. T. Labuan Nababan, Lamtiur Sinambela, Nita Syaputri, “PASKIBRA MENGGUNAKAN METODE PROFILE MATCHING PADA,” vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 343–354, 2024.
A. Nabila, N. A. Hasibuan, and D. P. Utomo, “Penerapan Metode Profile Matching (PM) Dalam Menentukan Pemilihan Duta Generasi Berencana (GenRe),” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 777–786, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i2.2074.
K. Nisa, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon PASKIBRAKA 2023 Kota Medan Menerapkan Metode MAUT,” vol. 7, pp. 254–265, 2024, doi: 10.30865/komik.v6i1.8060.
S. Anjelina Tambunan, S. Achmadi, and A. Faisol, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Anggota Paskibraka Kabupaten Biak Numfor Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching,” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2396–2402, 2023, doi: 10.36040/jati.v7i4.7527.
M. D. Damara and S. N. Anwar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Metode Profil Matching Untuk Seleksi Pemain Futsal ( Studi Kasus Di Asosiasi Futsal Kota U-19 Jepara ),” pp. 978–979, 2020.
M. A. A. F. Nst, M. H. Arrasyid, and E. Ndruru, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Menerapkan Metode MAUT,” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 72–79, 2022, doi: 10.47065/tin.v3i2.3639.
N. Diaz and Sulindawaty, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Peserta Paskibraka Kabupaten Karo Menggunakan Profile Matching,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 87–91, 2020, doi: 10.20884/1.jutif.2020.1.2.28.
Y. Setiawan and S. Budilaksono, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mahasiswa Lulusan Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (Maut) DiStmik Antar Bangsa,” Ikraith-Informatika, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 12–20, 2021, doi: 10.37817/ikraith-informatika.v6i2.1566.
R. Setiawan, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan E-Wallet Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching,” JEECOM J. Electr. Eng. Comput., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2023, doi: 10.33650/jeecom.v5i1.5801.
M. Huda and M. Nasir, “Implementasi Algoritma Profil Matching Dalam Menilai Kinerja Dosen,” J. Inform., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2022.
M. Dedy and S. Rahardjo, “BULLETIN OF COMPUTER SCIENCE RESEARCH Analisa Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan WASPAS Dalam Menentuan Tempat Pelatihan Kursus Computer Terbaik,” Media Online), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 41–51, 2024, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v5i1.379.
D. A. S. Mesran, Agus Perdana Windarto, Anjar Wanto, Dedy Hartama, Vio Sri Zuliyanti, Ayulia Puspita Wijaya, Arswendi Perdana, Franky Siringoringo, Sinta Maulina Dewi, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan & Data Mining: Metode dan Penerapannya Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan, 1st ed. green press, 2020.
E. Gede Surya Mahendra, Lely Priska D. Tampubolon, Herlinah, Sitti Arni, Lalu Puji Indra Kharisma, Mochzen Gito Resmi, I Gede Iwan Sudipa, Khairunnisa, Anak Agung Gede Bagus Ariana, Syahriani Syam, SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN (Teori dan Penerapannya dalam berbagai Metode). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan Profile Matching Terhadap Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Paskibraka
ARTICLE HISTORY
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizthy Shavna Azizah, Wafiah Murniati, Mardi Mardi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
